Skip to main content
The benefit of bilateral cochlear implants in adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The benefit of bilateral cochlear implants in adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article in CI Journal


Important research paper published in Cochlear Implants International Journal:

The benefit of bilateral cochlear implants in adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Manohar Bance; Maria Costales Marcos; Jérémie Guignard; Wendy Huinck; Matthijs Killian; Vikte Lionikaite; Hafsa Quadri; Kim Rand; Ville Sivonen

Abstract

Objectives:
To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) on hearing and quality-of-life (QoL) benefits of bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) in adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and to quantify benefits through a meta-analysis when feasible.

Methods:
Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane were searched from January 2005–June 2022. Eligible studies presented effectiveness of CIs and/or QoL of adult CI users. Articles that presented numerical point estimates for, or numerical difference between, bilateral and unilateral CI, and measures of uncertainty were considered for meta-analysis, with data analyzed using fixed- and random-effects models.

Results:
Thirty-five articles were included. There was a trend of significant improvement with bilateral CIs in sound localization and binaural redundancy. A meta-analysis confirmed statistically significant benefits in speech perception (in quiet, 12.6 percentage point [95% confidence interval: 7.1, 18.1] improvement; in noise, improvement in speech reception threshold of 1.5 dB signal-to-noise ratio [–1.5 dB; 95% confidence interval: −2.5, −0.4]). There were beneficial trends of bilateral CIs regarding head-shadow effect and binaural release from masking. Significant improvements in hearing-specific QoL were observed; generic QoL was mostly unchanged.

Discussion:
Bilateral CIs provide audiological benefit over unilateral CI, resulting in hearing-specific QoL improvements. Lack of changes in generic QoL may reflect that instrument domains are insensitive to hearing-related changes when going from unilateral to bilateral CIs. Meta-analyses could not be performed for all hearing and QoL outcomes owing to variability in methodologies across studies.

Conclusions:
These findings should be used to inform clinical decision-making to ensure the best outcomes for adults with bilateral SNHL.

 

BCIG members have free online access to the Journal via the Members' Area of this website.  Please contact Laura in the BCIG office should you have any problems accessing this feature.
info@bcig.org.uk

Become a BCIG Member

Membership of the BCIG is open to anyone who has a clinical role in the field of auditory implants, or who is actively involved in research into auditory implants or who represents other allied non-commercial organisations.

 

Join Today